Copyright
©The Author(s) 2015.
World J Gastroenterol. May 21, 2015; 21(19): 6008-6017
Published online May 21, 2015. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i19.6008
Published online May 21, 2015. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i19.6008
Table 2 Concordant vs non-concordant interrelation between remnant volume (donor) body weight ratio and remnant volume percentage of total liver volume in discriminating small-for-size from non-small-for-size remnants according to two different cut-off values
Remnant status defined by Rvbwr | Remnant status defined by Rv/tlv | ||
SFS | Non SFS | SFS | Non SFS |
RVBWR < 0.65 | RVBWR ≥ 0.65 | RV/TLV < 30% | RV/TLV ≥ 30% |
n = 8 | n = 63 | n = 6 | n = 65 |
RV/TLV < 30% | RV/TLV < 30% | RVBWR < 0.65 | RVBWR < 0.65 |
Concordant | Non-concordant | Concordant | Non-concordant |
2/8 | 4/63 | 2/61 | 5/652 |
25% | 6% | 33% | 8% |
RV/TLV ≥ 30% | RV/TLV ≥ 30% | RVBWR ≥ 0.65 | RVBWR ≥ 0.65 |
Non-concordant | Concordant | Non-concordant | Concordant |
6/8 | 59/63 | 4/6 | 60/65 |
75% | 94% | 67% | 92% |
- Citation: Radtke A, Sgourakis G, Molmenti EP, Beckebaum S, Cicinnati VR, Schmidt H, Peitgen HO, Broelsch CE, Malagó M, Schroeder T. Risk of venous congestion in live donors of extended right liver graft. World J Gastroenterol 2015; 21(19): 6008-6017
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v21/i19/6008.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v21.i19.6008