Copyright
©The Author(s) 2015.
World J Gastroenterol. May 21, 2015; 21(19): 5918-5925
Published online May 21, 2015. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i19.5918
Published online May 21, 2015. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i19.5918
Study | Study design | Patients screened | Patients randomized DGT | Timing of DGT | Success rate | Inadvertent success in DGT | PEP | Failure |
Maeda et al[13], 2003 | Single-center randomized study | 107 | 27 (25) | Unsuccessful within 10 min | 93% | NA | 0% | NA |
Herreros de Tejada et al[18], 2009 | Multicenter randomized study | 845 | 97 (11) | After 5 attempts | 47% | 18% | 17% | 10 more attempts |
Angsuwatcharakon et al[16], 2012 | Single-center randomized study | 426 | 23 (5) | Unsuccessful within 10 min | 73.9% | NA | 21.7% | Another 10 min |
Coté et al[27], 2012 | Two-center randomized study | 442 | 42 (10) | Unsuccessful within 6 min or 3 PD cannulations | 54.8% | 16.7% | 2.4% | Another 6 min |
Yoo et al[28], 2013 | Single-center randomized study | 1394 | 34 (2) | Unsuccessful within 10 min | 79.4% | NA | 38.2% | 10 more attempts |
-
Citation: Kim SJ, Kang DH, Kim HW, Choi CW, Park SB, Song BJ, Hong YM. Needle-knife fistulotomy
vs double-guidewire technique in patients with repetitive unintentional pancreatic cannulations. World J Gastroenterol 2015; 21(19): 5918-5925 - URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v21/i19/5918.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v21.i19.5918