Copyright
©The Author(s) 2015.
World J Gastroenterol. May 14, 2015; 21(18): 5591-5597
Published online May 14, 2015. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i18.5591
Published online May 14, 2015. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i18.5591
Prognostic factor | HR | 95%CI | P value |
CSS | |||
Location (upper vs middle vs lower) | 0.888 | 0.677-1.164 | 0.389 |
Differentiation (well vs moderate vs poor) | 1.156 | 0.911-1.468 | 0.233 |
pT status ( T1 vs T2 vs T3) | 1.101 | 0.778-1.559 | 0.586 |
pN status (N0 vs N1 vs N2 vs N3) | 1.615 | 1.266-2.061 | < 0.001 |
Stage (I vs II vs III) | 1.460 | 0.907-2.351 | 0.120 |
NLR ( ≤ 3.0 vs > 3.0) | 1.591 | 1.132-2.235 | 0.007 |
RFS | |||
Differentiation (well vs moderate vs poor) | 1.177 | 0.934-1.482 | 0.167 |
pT status (T1 vs T2 vs T3) | 1.088 | 0.782-1.515 | 0.615 |
pN status (N0 vs N1 vs N2 vs N3) | 1.703 | 1.337-2.169 | < 0.001 |
Stage (I vs II vs III) | 1.336 | 0.846-2.110 | 0.215 |
NLR ( ≤ 3.0 vs > 3.0) | 1.525 | 1.094-2.126 | 0.013 |
- Citation: Duan H, Zhang X, Wang FX, Cai MY, Ma GW, Yang H, Fu JH, Tan ZH, Meng YQ, Fu XY, Ma QL, Lin P. Prognostic role of neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio in operable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. World J Gastroenterol 2015; 21(18): 5591-5597
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v21/i18/5591.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v21.i18.5591