Copyright
©The Author(s) 2015.
World J Gastroenterol. May 14, 2015; 21(18): 5560-5567
Published online May 14, 2015. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i18.5560
Published online May 14, 2015. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i18.5560
Table 3 Comparison of endoscopic and biopsy diagnoses with final histology
| Final histology | |||
| Non-carcinoma | Carcinoma | ||
| Endoscopic Dx (n = 83) | Non-carcinoma (n = 26) | 12 | 14 |
| Carcinoma (n = 57) | 5 | 52 | |
| Sensitivity, 80%; Specificity, 72%; Accuracy, 78% | |||
| Biopsy Dx (n = 73) | Non-carcinoma (n = 28) | 12 | 16 |
| Carcinoma (n = 45) | 3 | 42 | |
| Sensitivity, 72%; Specificity, 80%; Accuracy, 74% | |||
- Citation: Kakushima N, Kanemoto H, Sasaki K, Kawata N, Tanaka M, Takizawa K, Imai K, Hotta K, Matsubayashi H, Ono H. Endoscopic and biopsy diagnoses of superficial, nonampullary, duodenal adenocarcinomas. World J Gastroenterol 2015; 21(18): 5560-5567
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v21/i18/5560.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v21.i18.5560