Copyright
©The Author(s) 2015.
World J Gastroenterol. May 14, 2015; 21(18): 5542-5547
Published online May 14, 2015. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i18.5542
Published online May 14, 2015. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i18.5542
Table 2 Characteristics and small bowel findings1 for each capsule group n (%)
PillCam SB2 cases | PillCam SB2-ex cases | P value (< 0.05) | |
Complete studies | 159 (79.5) | 176 (88) | 0.03 |
Average completed study duration | 4:15:56 | 4:51:27 | |
Abnormal finding total | 97 (48.5) | 70 (35) | 0.01 |
Bleeding | 21 (10.5) | 20 (10) | 1.00 |
AVM | 35 (17.5) | 19 (9.5) | 0.03 |
Erosive disease | 32 (16) | 26 (13) | 0.45 |
Polyp/mass (see text) | 9 (4.5) | 4 (2) | 0.26 |
Miscellaneous | 0 | 1 (1) | 1.00 |
- Citation: Rahman M, Akerman S, DeVito B, Miller L, Akerman M, Sultan K. Comparison of the diagnostic yield and outcomes between standard 8 h capsule endoscopy and the new 12 h capsule endoscopy for investigating small bowel pathology. World J Gastroenterol 2015; 21(18): 5542-5547
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v21/i18/5542.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v21.i18.5542