Copyright
©The Author(s) 2015.
World J Gastroenterol. May 14, 2015; 21(18): 5542-5547
Published online May 14, 2015. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i18.5542
Published online May 14, 2015. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i18.5542
Table 1 Demographics and indications for capsule endoscopy in each capsule group n (%)
PillCam SB2 cases | PillCam SB2-ex cases | P value (< 0.05) | |
Age (mean ± SD) | 70.90 ± 14.19 | 71.93 ± 13.80 | 0.46 |
Male | 91 (45.5) | 96 (48) | 0.69 |
Obscure GI bleed | 131 (65.5) | 146 (73) | 0.13 |
Anemia | 47 (23.5) | 36 (18) | 0.22 |
Anemia or obscure GI bleed | 178 (89) | 182 (91) | 0.62 |
AVM | 11 (5.5) | 9 (4.5) | 0.82 |
Other | 11 (5.5) | 9 (4.5) | 0.82 |
- Citation: Rahman M, Akerman S, DeVito B, Miller L, Akerman M, Sultan K. Comparison of the diagnostic yield and outcomes between standard 8 h capsule endoscopy and the new 12 h capsule endoscopy for investigating small bowel pathology. World J Gastroenterol 2015; 21(18): 5542-5547
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v21/i18/5542.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v21.i18.5542