Topic Highlight
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2015.
World J Gastroenterol. May 7, 2015; 21(17): 5158-5166
Published online May 7, 2015. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i17.5158
Table 1 Major studies regarding adjuvant chemotherapy in elderly patients with colon cancer
Ref.Type of studyNo. of total patientsNo. of older patients/age (yr)EndpointOutcome [HR (95%CI)]
Iwashyna et al[23]Population-based cohort study (SEER-Medicare)33573357 (100%)/≥ 705-FU vs observation:OS: 0.73 (0.65-0.82)
OS
Sargent et al[24]Pooled analysis of 7 randomized phase III trials3351506 (15%)/≥ 705-FU/LV vs observation:(1) TTR: 0.68 (0.60-0.76; P < 0.01)
(1) TTR(2) OS: 0.76 (0.68-0.85; P < 0.01)
(2) OS
Sanoff et al[26]Retrospective, database analysis (SEER-Medicare, NSYSCR, CanCONS, NCCN)54895489 (100%)/≥ 75OS in stage III:(1) 0.60 (0.53-0.68)
(1) CTx vs no CTx(2) SEER-Medicare: 0.84 (0.69-1.04)
(2) Oxaliplatin-based vs non-oxaliplatin regimensNYSCR: 0.82 (0.51-1.33)
McCleary et al[27]ACCENT group analysis in stage II/III145282575 (22%)/≥ 705-FU/LV or oral 5-FU vs combination regimens: DFS, OS, TTR in (1) older and (2) younger patients(1) DFS: 1.05 (0.94-1.19; P = 0.09)
OS: 1.08 (0.95-1.23; P = 0.05)
TTR: 1.06 (0.93-1.22; P = 0.36)
(2) DFS: 0.89 (0.80-0.99; P < 0.01)
TTR: 0.88 (0.79-0.98; P = 0.02)
OS: 1.08 (0.95-1.23; P = 0.04)1
Yothers et al[28]Exploratory subset analysis of updated results of NSABP C-07 trial2409396 (16%)/≥ 705-FU/LV vs oxaliplatin plus 5-FU/LV:
(1) DFS(1) DFS: 1.03 (0.77-1.36; P = 0.87)
(2) OS(2) OS: 1.18 (0.86-1.62; P = 0.30)
Tournigand et al[29]Subgroup analysis of MOSAIC trial for stage II disease and elderly patients2246315 (14%)/70-755-FU/LV vs FOLFOX4:
(1) DFS(1) DFS: 0.93 (0.64-1.35; P = 0.73)
(2) OS(2) OS: 1.10 (0.73-1.65; P = 0.66)