Meta-Analysis
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2015.
World J Gastroenterol. Apr 28, 2015; 21(16): 5081-5089
Published online Apr 28, 2015. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i16.5081
Table 3 Meta-analysis results
ComparisonOR95%CIP valueHeterogeneity
Effects model
I2P value
G vs T1.181.05-1.320.004171%< 0.00001Random
Caucasian1.090.94-1.260.2472%0.0004Random
Asian1.271.07-1.510.007170%0.003Random
Colorectal cancer1.150.99-1.330.0673%< 0.0001Random
Gastric cancer1.411.09-1.830.009170%0.02Random
Esophageal cancer1.010.88-1.160.870%0.40Fixed
GG vs TT1.250.98-1.590.0773%< 0.00001Random
Caucasian1.040.77-1.410.8172%0.0003Random
Asian1.581.05-2.380.03176%0.002Random
Colorectal cancer1.120.79-1.590.5179%< 0.00001Random
Gastric cancer1.771.11-2.840.02163%0.04Random
Esophageal cancer1.020.77-1.350.900%0.34Fixed
TG vs TT1.281.08-1.520.004168%< 0.0001Random
Caucasian1.260.98-1.630.0776%<0.0001Random
Asian1.301.01-1.670.04163%0.01Random
Colorectal cancer1.230.98-1.540.0873%< 0.0001Random
Gastric cancer1.661.20-2.310.002151%< 0.0001Random
Esophageal cancer1.040.83-1.310.720%0.41Fixed
GG+TG vs TT1.321.10-1.570.002173%< 0.00001Random
Caucasian1.240.95-1.610.1180%< 0.00001Random
Asian1.381.07-1.780.01166%0.007Random
Colorectal cancer1.230.98-1.550.0875%< 0.0001Random
Gastric cancer1.771.40-2.24< 0.0001119%0.29Fixed
Esophageal cancer1.020.81-1.290.849%0.29Fixed
GG vs TT+TG1.100.90-1.340.3370%< 0.0001Random
Caucasian0.950.75-1.200.6664%0.004Random
Asian1.360.95-1.950.1077%0.002Random
Colorectal cancer1.050.77-1.430.7679%< 0.00001Random
Gastric cancer1.250.99-1.560.0633%0.21Fixed
Esophageal cancer0.960.75-1.210.710%0.38Fixed