Copyright
©The Author(s) 2015.
World J Gastroenterol. Apr 28, 2015; 21(16): 4903-4910
Published online Apr 28, 2015. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i16.4903
Published online Apr 28, 2015. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i16.4903
Table 5 Univariate and multivariate analysis of factors affecting visual analog scale pain scores for colonoscope insertion by experts
| Factors | Pain | Univariate analysis | Multivariate analysis | |||
| P value | P value | OR | 95%CI | |||
| Insertion methods (straight vs roping) | No | 66/45 | 0.001 | 0.002 | 3.0 | 1.5-5.9 |
| Yes | 18/37 | |||||
| Gender (Male vs Female) | No | 77/34 | 0.098 | 0.486 | 1.3 | 0.6-2.8 |
| Yes | 31/24 | |||||
| UPD vs Conventional | No | 58/53 | 0.410 | |||
| Yes | 25/30 | |||||
| Abdominal surgery (+ vs -) | No | 4/107 | 0.422 | |||
| Yes | 9/46 | |||||
| Antispasmodic (+ vs -) | No | 102/9 | 0.343 | |||
| Yes | 48/7 | |||||
| Age (≥ 65 vs < 64 ) | No | 84/27 | 0.958 | |||
| Yes | 28/27 | |||||
- Citation: Fukuzawa M, Uematsu J, Kono S, Suzuki S, Sato T, Yagi N, Tsuji Y, Yagi K, Kusano C, Gotoda T, Kawai T, Moriyasu F. Clinical impact of endoscopy position detecting unit (UPD-3) for a non-sedated colonoscopy. World J Gastroenterol 2015; 21(16): 4903-4910
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v21/i16/4903.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v21.i16.4903