Copyright
©The Author(s) 2015.
World J Gastroenterol. Apr 28, 2015; 21(16): 4875-4882
Published online Apr 28, 2015. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i16.4875
Published online Apr 28, 2015. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i16.4875
Table 2 Comparison of incision infections and the mortality rates between the traditional laparotomy method and the modified laparotomy method (Fisher exact test)
| Group | Number of infected rabbits | Number of non-infected rabbits | Postoperative incision infection rate (%) | Mortality in each group | Survival in each group | Mortality rate (%) |
| A (traditional laparotomy method) | 2 | 9 | 18.2 | 5 | 10 | 33.3 |
| B (modified laparotomy method) | 1 | 14 | 6.7 | 0 | 15 | 0 |
| P value | 0.556 | 0.042 |
- Citation: Chen Z, Kang Z, Xiao EH, Tong M, Xiao YD, Li HB. Comparison of two different laparotomy methods for modeling rabbit VX2 hepatocarcinoma. World J Gastroenterol 2015; 21(16): 4875-4882
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v21/i16/4875.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v21.i16.4875