Copyright
©The Author(s) 2015.
World J Gastroenterol. Apr 28, 2015; 21(16): 4875-4882
Published online Apr 28, 2015. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i16.4875
Published online Apr 28, 2015. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i16.4875
Table 1 Comparison of the operation time and incision size between the traditional laparotomy method and the modified laparotomy method (t test, mean ± SD)
| Group | Mean operation time (min) | Mean incision size (cm) |
| A (traditional laparotomy method) | 21.2 ± 2.6 | 3.3 ± 0.5 |
| B (modified laparotomy method) | 17.6 ± 2.4 | 2.6 ± 0.4 |
| t test | 3.903 | 2.928 |
| P value | 0.001 | 0.007 |
- Citation: Chen Z, Kang Z, Xiao EH, Tong M, Xiao YD, Li HB. Comparison of two different laparotomy methods for modeling rabbit VX2 hepatocarcinoma. World J Gastroenterol 2015; 21(16): 4875-4882
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v21/i16/4875.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v21.i16.4875