Copyright
©The Author(s) 2015.
World J Gastroenterol. Apr 21, 2015; 21(15): 4707-4714
Published online Apr 21, 2015. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i15.4707
Published online Apr 21, 2015. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i15.4707
Visual distraction | No visual distraction | P value | |
Number of patients | 17 | 16 | 0.67 |
Cecal insertion rate | 100% | 100% | NS |
Time to reach cecum, in seconds, median (IQR, range) | 639 (305, 260-1669) | 611 (446.25, 326-1571) | 0.80 |
Time needed, for total procedure, in seconds, median (IQR, range) | 923 (302, 482-1856) | 1000.5 (427.5, 558-1822) | 0.93 |
Pre-procedural anxiety score, median (IQR, range) | 75 (18, 51-95) | 69 (24.75, 51-100) | 0.44 |
Anxiety score during procedure, median (IQR, range) | 20 (29, 7-85) | 68 (49.75, 11-91) | 0.05 |
Pain score during procedure, median (IQR, range) | 23 (30, 0-83) | 57 (40.25, 2-100) | 0.04 |
- Citation: Umezawa S, Higurashi T, Uchiyama S, Sakai E, Ohkubo H, Endo H, Nonaka T, Nakajima A. Visual distraction alone for the improvement of colonoscopy-related pain and satisfaction. World J Gastroenterol 2015; 21(15): 4707-4714
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v21/i15/4707.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v21.i15.4707