Copyright
©The Author(s) 2015.
World J Gastroenterol. Apr 21, 2015; 21(15): 4707-4714
Published online Apr 21, 2015. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i15.4707
Published online Apr 21, 2015. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i15.4707
Table 2 Features and outcomes of procedure
| Group 1 (visual distraction) | Group 2 (no visual distraction) | P value | |
| Cecal insertion rate | 96.4% | 96.6% | 0.98 |
| Time to reach cecum, in seconds, median (IQR, range) | 634.5 (230, 150-1669) | 720 (430, 326-2040) | 0.52 |
| Time needed for total procedure, in seconds, median (IQR, range) | 921 (245.25, 412-1856) | 1056 (375, 558-2375) | 0.29 |
| Systolic blood pressure, in mmHg, median (IQR, range) | |||
| Before procedure | 132.5 (22.75, 102-165) | 132 (27, 98-170) | 0.96 |
| Highest during procedure | 140 (21.75, 99-220) | 134 (46, 107-193) | 0.99 |
| After procedure | 128.5 (14.5, 97-182) | 127 (25, 100-165) | 0.85 |
- Citation: Umezawa S, Higurashi T, Uchiyama S, Sakai E, Ohkubo H, Endo H, Nonaka T, Nakajima A. Visual distraction alone for the improvement of colonoscopy-related pain and satisfaction. World J Gastroenterol 2015; 21(15): 4707-4714
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v21/i15/4707.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v21.i15.4707