Copyright
©The Author(s) 2015.
World J Gastroenterol. Apr 7, 2015; 21(13): 3944-3952
Published online Apr 7, 2015. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i13.3944
Published online Apr 7, 2015. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i13.3944
Characteristic | |
No. of patients | 24 |
Median age, yr (range) | 68 (56-80) |
Gender | |
Male | 19 (79) |
Female | 5 (21) |
Location | |
Upper third | 4 (17) |
Middle third | 0 (0) |
Lower third | 20 (83) |
Macroscopic shape | |
Elevated | 23 (96) |
Flat | 1 (4) |
Depressed | 0 (0) |
Ulceration | 5 (21) |
Histologic type | |
PP type | 13 (54) |
MP with diff. | 9 (38) |
MP with undiff. | 2 (8) |
Median size, mm (range) | 22 (6-59) |
≤ 30 | 18 (75) |
> 30 | 6 (25) |
Depth of invasion | |
Mucosa (m1:m2:m3) | 14 (0:4:10) (58) |
Submucosa (sm1:sm2) | 10 (4:6) (42) |
Lymphovascular invasion | 5 (21) |
Lymph node metastasis | 1 (4) |
- Citation: Lee HJ, Kim GH, Park DY, Lee BE, Jeon HK, Jhi JH, Song GA. Is endoscopic submucosal dissection safe for papillary adenocarcinoma of the stomach? World J Gastroenterol 2015; 21(13): 3944-3952
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v21/i13/3944.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v21.i13.3944