Copyright
©The Author(s) 2015.
World J Gastroenterol. Apr 7, 2015; 21(13): 3944-3952
Published online Apr 7, 2015. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i13.3944
Published online Apr 7, 2015. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i13.3944
Characteristic | |
No. of patients | 49 |
Median age, yr (range) | 66 (48-80) |
Gender | |
Male | 35 (71) |
Female | 14 (29) |
Location | |
Upper third | 5 (10) |
Middle third | 2 (4) |
Lower third | 42 (86) |
Macroscopic shape | |
Elevated | 36 (73) |
Flat | 0 (0) |
Depressed | 13 (27) |
Ulceration | 12 (24) |
Histologic type | |
PP type | 28 (57) |
MP with diff. | 14 (29) |
MP with undiff. | 7 (14) |
Median size, mm (range) | 30 (9-105) |
≤ 30 | 24 (49) |
> 30 | 25 (51) |
Depth of invasion | |
Mucosa (m1:m2:m3) | 14 (0:0:14) (29) |
Submucosa (sm1:sm2) | 35 (8:27) (71) |
Lymphovascular invasion | 15 (31) |
Lymph node metastasis | 9 (18) |
- Citation: Lee HJ, Kim GH, Park DY, Lee BE, Jeon HK, Jhi JH, Song GA. Is endoscopic submucosal dissection safe for papillary adenocarcinoma of the stomach? World J Gastroenterol 2015; 21(13): 3944-3952
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v21/i13/3944.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v21.i13.3944