Copyright
©The Author(s) 2015.
World J Gastroenterol. Apr 7, 2015; 21(13): 3921-3927
Published online Apr 7, 2015. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i13.3921
Published online Apr 7, 2015. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i13.3921
Variable | Appendiceal diverticulitis (n = 25) | Acute appendicitis (n = 25) | |||
Median | Range | Median | Range | P value | |
Appendiceal diameter (mm) | 13.2 | 4.3-23.4 | 12.4 | 8.1-18.9 | 0.252 |
Appendiceal wall thickening (mm) | 3.1 | 1.6-5.3 | 3.7 | 2.0-6.2 | 0.772 |
Number | Rate | Number | Rate | ||
Visualized appendix (yes/total) | 13 | 52% | 25 | 100% | < 0.0011 |
Fluid collection in the appendix lumen (yes/total) | 4 | 16% | 22 | 88% | < 0.0011 |
Formation of localized abscess (yes/total) | 17 | 68% | 4 | 16% | < 0.0011 |
Periappendiceal fat stranding(yes/total) | 16 | 66% | 11 | 44% | 0.171 |
Appendiceal or abscess wall enhancement (yes /total) | 10 | 58% | 9 | 41% | 0.271 |
Apendicolith (yes/total) | 2 | 8% | 12 | 48% | 0.00471 |
Visualized appendiceal diverticulum (yes /total) | 6 | 24% | 0 | 0% | 0.0251 |
-
Citation: Ito D, Miki K, Seiichiro S, Hata S, Kobayashi K, Teruya M, Kaminishi M. Clinical and computed tomography findings of appendiceal diverticulitis
vs acute appendicitis. World J Gastroenterol 2015; 21(13): 3921-3927 - URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v21/i13/3921.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v21.i13.3921