Copyright
©The Author(s) 2015.
World J Gastroenterol. Mar 28, 2015; 21(12): 3671-3678
Published online Mar 28, 2015. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i12.3671
Published online Mar 28, 2015. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i12.3671
Table 1 Modified observer’s assessment of alertness/sedation
| Alertness/sedation level | Description |
| 6 | Agitated |
| 5 | Respond readily to name spoken in normal tone (alert) |
| 4 | Lethargic response to name spoken in normal tone |
| 3 | Responds only after name is called loudly, repeatedly, or both |
| 2 | Responds only after mild prodding or shaking |
| 1 | Does not respond to mild prodding or shaking |
| 0 | Does not respond to deep stimulus (asleep) |
- Citation: Kim N, Yoo YC, Lee SK, Kim H, Ju HM, Min KT. Comparison of the efficacy and safety of sedation between dexmedetomidine-remifentanil and propofol-remifentanil during endoscopic submucosal dissection. World J Gastroenterol 2015; 21(12): 3671-3678
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v21/i12/3671.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v21.i12.3671