Copyright
©The Author(s) 2015.
World J Gastroenterol. Mar 21, 2015; 21(11): 3300-3307
Published online Mar 21, 2015. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i11.3300
Published online Mar 21, 2015. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i11.3300
Factors | Univariate analysis of DFS | Multivariate analysis of DFS | ||
P | HR | 95%CI | P1 | |
Radiofrequency ablation | 0.033 | 1.57 | 1.02-2.41 | 0.040 |
Female sex | 0.890 | |||
Age | 0.270 | |||
CEA (ng/mL) | 0.130 | 1.03 | 0.99-1.01 | 0.480 |
Size (cm) | 0.210 | |||
Multiple | 0.140 | 1.01 | 0.65-1.57 | 0.970 |
Metachronous | 0.089 | 0.75 | 0.45-1.24 | 0.260 |
Bilobal | 0.300 | |||
T22 | 0.130 | 0.55 | 0.18-1.65 | 0.290 |
T32 | 0.090 | 0.78 | 0.41-1.49 | 0.450 |
Lymph node metastasis | 0.003 | 1.94 | 1.14-3.31 | 0.015 |
Adjuvant chemotherapy | 0.810 | |||
Poorly differentiated grade | 0.033 | 1.79 | 1.01-3.18 | 0.049 |
-
Citation: Lee H, Heo JS, Cho YB, Yun SH, Kim HC, Lee WY, Choi SH, Choi DW. Hepatectomy
vs radiofrequency ablation for colorectal liver metastasis: A propensity score analysis. World J Gastroenterol 2015; 21(11): 3300-3307 - URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v21/i11/3300.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v21.i11.3300