Meta-Analysis
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2015.
World J Gastroenterol. Mar 14, 2015; 21(10): 3100-3108
Published online Mar 14, 2015. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i10.3100
Table 2 Patient characteristics of included studies
Ref.GroupsnAge (yr)Sex (M/F)Etiology (alcohol/viral/other)Child-Pugh score or class A/B/CFollow-up (mo)Lost to follow-upSmall varices, nNo varices, n
Andreani et al[11]Propranolol4355.0 ± 1.327/1633/-/1010/19/13NA6150
Placebo4155.6 ± 1.723/1833/-/810/21/10NA2170
Conn et al[16]Propranolol5154 ± 938/1339/-/12Mean: 8.017.1 ± 10.9NA260
Placebo5154 ± 1135/1641/-/10Mean: 8.316.3 ± 12NA290
Calés et al[12]Propranolol10252.7 ± 10.469/3388/-/246.8 ± 2.1NA416042
Placebo10452.7 ± 11.468/3681/-/236.8 ± 2.0NA326737
Merkel et al[14]Nadolol8356 ± 945/3847/34/26.8 ± 1.636 ± 1811830
Placebo7857 ± 938/4045/28/57.1 ± 1.935 ± 1510780
Groszmann et al[13]Timolol10846 ± 1170/3826/73/95.4 ± 0.7Median: 52.700108
Placebo10544 ± 1156/4925/69/115.4 ± 0.8Median: 57.900105
Sarin et al[15]Propranolol7742 ± 1363/1427/42/87.4 ± 1.925 ± 12.60770
Placebo7344 ± 1357/1626/38/97.7 ± 2.30730