Copyright
©The Author(s) 2015.
World J Gastroenterol. Jan 7, 2015; 21(1): 132-138
Published online Jan 7, 2015. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i1.132
Published online Jan 7, 2015. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i1.132
Ref. | Year | Country | Design | Location | Stage | n | Surgical technique | Node count | Node postivity rate | Survival |
West et al[42] | 2012 | Japan/Germany | Retrospective multicenter study | Colon | I-IV | 254 | D3 resection vs CME | More nodes after CMEa | No difference | Not investigated |
Hashiguchi et al[31] | 2011 | Japan | Retrospective single center study | Colon | I-IV | 914 | Left hemicolectomy with variable extent of lymph node dissection | More nodes after vertical dissection | No difference | Shorter if no vertical node dissection. No influence of main node removal or extent of horizontal node dissection |
West et al[30] | 2010 | United Kingdom/Germany | Prospective and retrospective multicenter study | Colon | I-IV | 89 | Hemicolectomy vs CME | More nodes after CMEa | No difference | Not investigated |
Tentes et al[29] | 2007 | Greece | Prospective single center study | Left colon | I: 10.5% II: 42.7% III: 40.3% IV: 6.5% | 124 | Left hemicolectomy vs left hemicolectomy + periaortic lymphadenectomy | More nodes after radical resection | No difference | No difference except longer survival after radical resection for stage III |
Tagliacozzo et al[28] | 1997 | Italy | Retrospective single center study | Right Colon | I: 24.3% II: 35.4% III: 40.3% | 144 | Right hemicolectomy vs right hemicolectomy + retropancreatic lymphadenectomy | More nodes after radical resection | No difference | No difference |
Rouffet et al[27] | 1994 | France | Prospective multicenter study | Left colon | I-IV | 260 | Left segmental colectomy vs left hemicolectomy | Not investigated | Not investigated | No difference |
- Citation: Willaert W, Ceelen W. Extent of surgery in cancer of the colon: Is more better? World J Gastroenterol 2015; 21(1): 132-138
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v21/i1/132.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v21.i1.132