Review
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2015.
World J Gastroenterol. Jan 7, 2015; 21(1): 12-20
Published online Jan 7, 2015. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i1.12
Table 2 Published studies on anal fistula plug
Ref.Type of studyNo. PatientsSuccess rateFollow-up (mo)
Johnson et al[41]Prospective1587%7
Non-randomized
Controlled trial
Champagne et al[44]Prospective4683%12
O’Connor et al[45]Prospective20 (Crohn’s)80%10
Van Koperen et al[46]Prospective1742%7
Ellis[47]Retrospective18 (5 rectovaginal)88%6
Lawes et al[48]Retrospective17 plug66%7.4
3 pug+flap
Ky et al[49]Prospective44 plug+flap54.6%6.5
Schwandner et al[50]Prospective19 (7 Crohn’s)61% overall9
45.5% cryptoglandular
85.7% Crohn’s
Garg[51]Prospective2171%10
Christoforidis et al[52]Retrospective4743%6.5
Thekkinkattil et al[53]Prospective4344%11
Safar et al[54]Retrospective3514%4
Ortiz et al[55]Prospective Randomized trial31 cryptoglandular: -15 plug -16 endorectal-advancement flap (EAF)20% (plug group) 87.5% (EAF)12
El-Gazzaz et al[56]Retrospective3325%7.4
Chan et al[57]Prospective4450%10.5
Cintron et al[58]Prospective7342.5%15