Copyright
©2014 Baishideng Publishing Group Co.
World J Gastroenterol. Mar 7, 2014; 20(9): 2176-2185
Published online Mar 7, 2014. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i9.2176
Published online Mar 7, 2014. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i9.2176
Table 1 Rate of histologically adequate specimens procured using the 3 common size fine needles in recent literature
Ref. | Needle size | Number of patients | Histological adequacy | Location of biopsy |
Bang et al[45] | 22-G FNA | 28 | 66.7% | Pancreas |
22-G FNB | 28 | |||
Yasuda et al[52] | 19-G | 104 | 98.0% | Lymph nodes |
Rong et al[51] | 22-G | 54 | 70.4% | Pancreas |
25-G | 54 | 61.1% | Pancreas | |
22-G | 27 | 74.1% | Submucosal tumors | |
25-G | 27 | 55.6% | Submucosal tumors | |
Larghi et al[53] | 19-G | 120 | 97.5% | Various |
Varadarajulu et al[19] | 19-G1 | 38 | 94.7% | Subepithelial masses |
Pancreatic (head and uncinate lesions) |
- Citation: Karadsheh Z, Al-Haddad M. Endoscopic ultrasound guided fine needle tissue acquisition: Where we stand in 2013? World J Gastroenterol 2014; 20(9): 2176-2185
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v20/i9/2176.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v20.i9.2176