Copyright
©2014 Baishideng Publishing Group Co.
World J Gastroenterol. Feb 14, 2014; 20(6): 1517-1528
Published online Feb 14, 2014. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i6.1517
Published online Feb 14, 2014. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i6.1517
Table 2 Second and third line treatment options and study results
Reported eradication rates in studies | Ref. | Comments | |
Second line treatment options and study results | |||
After failure of clarithromycin-triple therapy | |||
Repeat PPI, amoxicillin and clarithromycin | 46% (overall) | [55] | Not recommended |
PPI, amoxicillin, metronidazole | 87% (overall) | [55] | Feasible in Japan with < 10% metronidazole resistance rateBetter with extended duration1 |
96% (ITT) | [77] | ||
100% (PP) | [77] | ||
Bismuth-containing quadruple therapy: PPI, bismuth, tetracycline, metronidazole | 78% (overall) | [55] | Better with extended duration1 |
69.8% (ITT) | [54] | ||
82.2% (PP) | [54] | ||
84.2% (ITT) | [62] | ||
92.3% (PP) | [62] | ||
79.7% (ITT) | [63] | ||
90.8% (PP) | [63] | ||
Bismuth-containing quadruple therapy: PPI, bismuth, amoxicillin, metronidazole | 72% (overall) | [55] | |
Bismuth-containing quadruple therapy: PPI, bismuth, tetracycline, amoxicillin | 73% (overall) | [55] | |
61.4% (overall) | [73] | ||
Bismuth quadruple therapy: PPI, bismuth, tetracycline, levofloxacin | 78.9% (ITT) | [63] | |
87.0% (PP) | [63] | ||
PPI, amoxicillin and levofloxacin | 76% (overall) | [55] | Better with extended duration1 |
76.5% (overall) | [61] | ||
PPI, levofloxacin, metronidazole | 67.9% (ITT) | [62] | |
73.1% (PP) | [62] | ||
Sequential therapy: PPI and amoxicillin for 5 d, followed by PPI, levofloxacin, nitroimidazole for 5 d | 78-95% (overall) | [55] | |
Moxifloxacin, PPI, amoxicillin | 74.9% (overall) | [72] | 14-d regimen better than 7-d regimen |
87.2% (ITT, overall) | [73] | ||
After failure of PPI-clarithromycin-nitroimidazole/metronidazole | |||
Bismuth-containing quadruple therapy: PPI, bismuth, tetracycline, metronidazole | 85% (overall) | [55] | |
After failure of non-bismuth quadruple therapy | |||
PPI, amoxicillin, levofloxacin | 81% (overall) | [55] | |
Third line treatment options and study results | |||
Susceptibility based selection therapy | 88.6% (ITT and PP) | [86] | Rescue therapy was rifabutin, amoxicillin and PPI for 12 d |
90% (ITT and PP) | [86] | Rescue therapy was levofloxacin, amoxicillin and PPI for 10 d | |
80.7% (ITT) | [82] | ||
82.6% (PP) | [82] | ||
10 d sequential therapy: PPI, amoxicillin for 5 d, then PPI, levofloxacin and tetracycline for 5 d | 67.23% (ITT) | [92] | |
68.38% (PP) | [92] | ||
Rifabutin-containing therapies | 66% (55%-77%) (overall) | [84] | Rifabutin 300 mg/d dose is more effective than 150 mg/d |
Rifabutin, amoxicillin, PPI | 63% (overall) | [84] | |
Rifaximin, levofloxacin and PPI | 65% | [85] | Failed first line clarithromycin-triple therapy and second-line bismuth-containing quadruple therapy |
Sitafloxacin, rabeprazole, amoxicillin | 75% (ITT) | [96] | Failed first line clarithromycin-amoxicillin PPI and failed second line metronidazole-amoxicillin-PPI |
80% (PP) | [96] | ||
78.2% (ITT) | [97] | ||
83.6% (PP) | [97] |
-
Citation: Song M, Ang TL. Second and third line treatment options for
Helicobacter pylori eradication. World J Gastroenterol 2014; 20(6): 1517-1528 - URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v20/i6/1517.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v20.i6.1517