Copyright
©2014 Baishideng Publishing Group Co.
World J Gastroenterol. Feb 7, 2014; 20(5): 1155-1164
Published online Feb 7, 2014. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i5.1155
Published online Feb 7, 2014. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i5.1155
Indication | Ref. | n | Inclusion criteria | Diagnostic criteria | Results |
Mucosal healing | Efthimyou et al[28] | 40 | Patients with active CD (CDAI > 150) who responded to anti-inflammatory treatment, VCE was performed before and after treatment | Number of aphthous ulcers/large ulcers/length of involved segment | Only number of large ulcers correlated with response (8.3 ± 1.4 and 5/0.8, 95%CI: 0.8-5.9, P < 0.01) |
Postoperative recurrence | Bourreille et al[31] | 31 | CD with ileocolonic anastomosis | Rutgeerts score ≥ 1 | VCE-21/31 (68%), IC-19/31 (61%) |
Pons Beltrán et al[32] | 24 | CD with ileocolonic anastomosis | Rutgeerts score ≥ 2 | VCE-14/22 (55%), IC-6/24 (25%) | |
Unexplained symptoms | Dubcenco et al[34] | 28 | Active CD patients | ≥ 3 ulcers | VCE-23 (82%), IC-14 50%, barium radiography-9 (32%) |
Dussault et al[35] | 25 | Active CD patients with unexplained symptoms | Severity graded by number and appearance of ulcers and presence of stenosis | Active SB inflammation: 11/25 (44%) |
- Citation: Kopylov U, Seidman EG. Role of capsule endoscopy in inflammatory bowel disease. World J Gastroenterol 2014; 20(5): 1155-1164
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v20/i5/1155.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v20.i5.1155