Three-field vs two-field lymph node dissection for esophageal cancer: A meta-analysis

doi:10.3748/wjg.v20.i47.18022

Advanced Search

BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge

Home / Archive / Volume 20, Issue 47

This Article

Academic Content and Language Evaluation of This Article

Citation of this article

Corresponding Author of This Article

Research Domain of This Article

Article-Type of This Article

Open-Access Policy of This Article

Times Cited Counts in Google of This Article

Number of Hits and Downloads for This Article

Total Article Views (9322)

All Articles published online

The chart showing PDF series, WORD series, HTML series, Figures (1-4) series, Tables (1-2) series.

Item

Count

PDF

615

WORD

243

HTML

5570

Figures (1-4)

341

Tables (1-2)

282

Sum=7051

Publishing Process of This Article

The chart showing Browse series, Download series.

Item

Count

Browse

1052

Download

1219

Sum=2271

Dec 21, 2014 (publication date) through Feb 6, 2025

Times Cited of This Article

Times Cited (75)

Journal Information of This Article

Publication Name

World Journal of Gastroenterology

ISSN

1007-9327

Publisher of This Article

Baishideng Publishing Group Inc, 7041 Koll Center Parkway, Suite 160, Pleasanton, CA 94566, USA

Meta-Analysis

World J Gastroenterol. Dec 21, 2014; 20(47): 18022-18030
Published online Dec 21, 2014. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i47.18022

Full Size Figure Download Figure

Figure 2 Forest plot of the 1-year overall survival rate. 3FL: 3-field lymphadenectomy; 2FL: 2-field lymphadenectomy.

Citation: Ma GW, Situ DR, Ma QL, Long H, Zhang LJ, Lin P, Rong TH. Three-field vs two-field lymph node dissection for esophageal cancer: A meta-analysis. World J Gastroenterol 2014; 20(47): 18022-18030
URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v20/i47/18022.htm
DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v20.i47.18022