Copyright
©2014 Baishideng Publishing Group Inc.
World J Gastroenterol. Dec 21, 2014; 20(47): 17993-18000
Published online Dec 21, 2014. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i47.17993
Published online Dec 21, 2014. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i47.17993
Table 3 Inter-observer variation between endoscopists and pathologist
| Agreement | kappa | P value | ||
| Overall (all lesion types) | 73.7% | 0.43 | < 0.001 | |
| Lesion site: | Luminal | 75.0% | 0.40 | < 0.001 |
| Ampulla/PB | 70.4% | 0.19 | 0.191 | |
| Degree of abnormality | Benign | 60.0% | 0.13 | 0.102 |
| Dysplasia | 84.0% | 0.58 | < 0.001 | |
| Neoplasia | 73.7% | 0.07 | 0.114 | |
| Dysplasia/neoplasia combined | 79.7% | 0.55 | < 0.001 |
- Citation: Peter S, Council L, Bang JY, Neumann H, Mönkemüller K, Varadarajulu S, Wilcox CM. Poor agreement between endoscopists and gastrointestinal pathologists for the interpretation of probe-based confocal laser endomicroscopy findings. World J Gastroenterol 2014; 20(47): 17993-18000
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v20/i47/17993.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v20.i47.17993