Clinical Trials Study
Copyright ©2014 Baishideng Publishing Group Inc.
World J Gastroenterol. Dec 21, 2014; 20(47): 17985-17992
Published online Dec 21, 2014. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i47.17985
Table 4 Comparison of fatty liver diagnosis by the ultrasound quantitative model, the ultrasound hepatic/renal ratio, the hepatic echo-intensity attenuation rate, and conventional ultrasound
Group1H-MRS diagnosis of fatty liver
Sensitivity (%)Specificity (%)Positive predictive value (%)Negative predictive value (%)
All subjects
Quantitative ultrasound model94.7100.0100.082.6
Conventional ultrasound83.770.790.058.0
Ultrasound hepatic/renal ratio88.384.594.272.4
Hepatic echo-intensity attenuation rate86.778.792.067.0
Subjects with fatty content < 15% (1H-MRS)
Quantitative ultrasound model81.4100.0100.084.5
Conventional ultrasound47.670.373.162.7
Ultrasound hepatic/renal ratio67.581.787.670.3
Hepatic echo-intensity attenuation rate55.674.382.168.7