Copyright
©2014 Baishideng Publishing Group Inc.
World J Gastroenterol. Dec 21, 2014; 20(47): 17985-17992
Published online Dec 21, 2014. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i47.17985
Published online Dec 21, 2014. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i47.17985
Group | 1H-MRS diagnosis of fatty liver | |||
Sensitivity (%) | Specificity (%) | Positive predictive value (%) | Negative predictive value (%) | |
All subjects | ||||
Quantitative ultrasound model | 94.7 | 100.0 | 100.0 | 82.6 |
Conventional ultrasound | 83.7 | 70.7 | 90.0 | 58.0 |
Ultrasound hepatic/renal ratio | 88.3 | 84.5 | 94.2 | 72.4 |
Hepatic echo-intensity attenuation rate | 86.7 | 78.7 | 92.0 | 67.0 |
Subjects with fatty content < 15% (1H-MRS) | ||||
Quantitative ultrasound model | 81.4 | 100.0 | 100.0 | 84.5 |
Conventional ultrasound | 47.6 | 70.3 | 73.1 | 62.7 |
Ultrasound hepatic/renal ratio | 67.5 | 81.7 | 87.6 | 70.3 |
Hepatic echo-intensity attenuation rate | 55.6 | 74.3 | 82.1 | 68.7 |
- Citation: Zhang B, Ding F, Chen T, Xia LH, Qian J, Lv GY. Ultrasound hepatic/renal ratio and hepatic attenuation rate for quantifying liver fat content. World J Gastroenterol 2014; 20(47): 17985-17992
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v20/i47/17985.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v20.i47.17985