Copyright
©2014 Baishideng Publishing Group Inc.
World J Gastroenterol. Dec 21, 2014; 20(47): 17962-17969
Published online Dec 21, 2014. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i47.17962
Published online Dec 21, 2014. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i47.17962
Table 3 Comparison of complications between the two groups n (%)
| Group A (n = 64) | Group B (n = 89) | P value | |
| Pancreatitis | 3 (4.7) | 4 (4.5) | > 0.05 |
| Hyperamylasemia | 7 (10.9) | 9 (10.1) | > 0.05 |
| Bleeding | 1 (1.6) | 5 (5.6) | < 0.05 |
| Minor bleeding | 1 (1.6) | 3 (3.3) | |
| Major bleeding | 0 | 2 (2.2) | |
| Mortality | 0 | 2 (2.2) | |
| Perforation | 0 | 0 | |
| Acute cholangitis and cholecystitis | 0 | 0 | |
| Recurrence of CBD stones | 1 (1.6) | 6 (6.7) | < 0.05 |
-
Citation: Guo SB, Meng H, Duan ZJ, Li CY. Small sphincterotomy combined with endoscopic papillary large balloon dilation
vs sphincterotomy alone for removal of common bile duct stones. World J Gastroenterol 2014; 20(47): 17962-17969 - URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v20/i47/17962.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v20.i47.17962