Topic Highlight
Copyright ©2014 Baishideng Publishing Group Inc.
World J Gastroenterol. Dec 21, 2014; 20(47): 17746-17755
Published online Dec 21, 2014. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i47.17746
Table 1 Overview of peroral endoscopic myotomy efficacy and gastro-esophageal reflux disease data
Location primary investigatorPatients (n)Mean age (yr)Eckardt score (pre/post)LES pressure (pre/post) (mmHg)Follow-up (mo)Timed barium esophagramEfficacyObjective GERD evidence n (%)
Costamagna et al[34], Rome, Italy1141 (23-68)7.1/1.145.1/16.93100%
Swanstrom et al[13], Portland, Oregon1859 (22-88)6/045/16.86Median emptying at 5 min 15/16: 80%-100% emptying 1/16 less than 80% emptying94%Esophagitis (Grade 1 Savory-Miller classification)
4/14 (28)
+pH study
6/13 (46)
Chiu et al[35], Hong Kong, China1647 (22-87)5.5/043.6/29.83100%+pH study 3/15 (20)
Hungness et al[36], Chicago, Illinois1838 (22-69)7/119/963Median height89%Esophagitis
1 min 7 cm (0-15 cm)Los Angeles (LA) class
2 min 5 (0-13 cm)A 2/15 (13.3)
5 min 0 (0-9 cm) (P < 0.001)B 2/15 (13.3)
C 1/15 (6.7)
Minami et al[37], Nagasaki, Japan2852 (19-84)6.7/0.771.2/21163100%Esophagitis (11/28) 39.3%
LA class
M 2/28
A 7/28
B 1/28
C 1/28
Von Renteln et al[38], European MCT70456.9/127.6/8.91282%Esophagitis (42)
LA class
A 29.2%
B 12.3%
Stavropoulos et al[31], Mineola, New York110052 (17-93)7.8/0.244.2/17.613.32Mean emptying at 5 min98%Esophagitis
31/42: 100% emptying17/53 (32)
41/42: > 50% emptying+pH study
17/52 (33)
Onimaru et al[39], Yokohama, Japan130045 (3-87)6.13/1.3327.3/13.41298%
Verlaan et al[40], Amsterdam, Netherlands10438/120.5/6.83Median height100%Esophagitis (60%)
1 min 3.2 cm (IQR 0.5-6.5) (P = 0.005)LA class
2 min 2.7 cm (IQR 0.4-5.2) (P = 0.005)A 3/10 (30)
5 min 2.3 cm (IQR 0-3.2) (P = 0.005)B 3/10 (30)