Copyright
©2014 Baishideng Publishing Group Inc.
World J Gastroenterol. Dec 21, 2014; 20(47): 17709-17726
Published online Dec 21, 2014. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i47.17709
Published online Dec 21, 2014. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i47.17709
Ref. | Period of inclusion | Comparisons | Trials, n1 | Patients, n1 | Results |
Hsu and Imperiale[14] | 1980-1996 | PEG vs NaP | 8/8 | 1286/1286 | NaP better than PEG: |
Better at cleansing | |||||
Better at compliance | |||||
Lower cost | |||||
Safety: NaP = PEG | |||||
Tan et al[15] | 1990-2005 | PEG/NaP/sodium picosulfate | 29/18 | 6459/3484 | NaP better than PEG: |
Better at cleansing | |||||
Better at compliance | |||||
Safety: NaP = PEG | |||||
Belsey et al[16] | Until January 2006 | PEG/NaP/Others | 82/25 | -/3748 | Cleansing: PEG = NaP |
NaP better for tolerance | |||||
Safety: PEG = NaP | |||||
Juluri et al[17] | 1990-2008 | PEG vs NaP | 18/18 | 2792/2792 | NaP better than PEG: |
Better at cleansing | |||||
Better at compliance | |||||
Safety: NaP = PEG | |||||
Juluri et al[18] | 1990-2008 | PEG vs NaP | 71/71 | 10201/10201 | Not statistically different |
NaP more likely to comply better | |||||
Belsey et al[19] | Until June 2010 | PEG/NaP/others | 104/31 | -/4450 | PEG = NaP |
PEG better than NaP in proximal colon | |||||
No information about compliance |
- Citation: Parra-Blanco A, Ruiz A, Alvarez-Lobos M, Amorós A, Gana JC, Ibáñez P, Ono A, Fujii T. Achieving the best bowel preparation for colonoscopy. World J Gastroenterol 2014; 20(47): 17709-17726
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v20/i47/17709.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v20.i47.17709