Copyright
©2014 Baishideng Publishing Group Inc.
World J Gastroenterol. Dec 14, 2014; 20(46): 17558-17567
Published online Dec 14, 2014. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i46.17558
Published online Dec 14, 2014. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i46.17558
Table 1 Comparison of three magnetic resonance parameters and aspartate aminotransferase to the platelet ratio index score between hepatic fibrosis group and non-hepatic fibrosis group
Liver stiffness (kPa) | ADC (× 10-3 mm2/s) | CEI | APRI | |||||
HF | nHF | HF | nHF | HF | nHF | HF | nHF | |
Sample size | 23 | 19 | 23 | 19 | 23 | 19 | 23 | 19 |
Value range | 1.44-10.46 | 1.46-3.28 | 0.80-1.32 | 0.96-1.46 | 0.44-2.04 | 1.33-2.02 | 0.18-3.00 | 0.12-1.52 |
Median | 3.79 | 2.04 | 1.04 | 1.20 | 1.63 | 1.71 | 0.77 | 0.33 |
Mean ± SD | 4.05 ± 2.06 | 2.1 ± 0.44 | 1.04 ± 0.11 | 1.21 ± 0.12 | 1.57 ± 0.38 | 1.7 ± 0.22 | 0.99 ± 0.67 | 0.42 ± 0.36 |
P value1 | < 0.0001 | 0.0001 | 0.3002 | 0.0002 |
- Citation: Park HS, Kim YJ, Yu MH, Choe WH, Jung SI, Jeon HJ. Three-Tesla magnetic resonance elastography for hepatic fibrosis: Comparison with diffusion-weighted imaging and gadoxetic acid-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging. World J Gastroenterol 2014; 20(46): 17558-17567
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v20/i46/17558.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v20.i46.17558