Review
Copyright ©2014 Baishideng Publishing Group Inc.
World J Gastroenterol. Dec 7, 2014; 20(45): 16984-16995
Published online Dec 7, 2014. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i45.16984
Table 2 Comparison of two-man method vs one-man sitting method vs one-man standing method
Two-man methodOne-man standing methodOne-man sitting method
The proportion of colonoscopists using methodsA fewMostA few (More than two-man method)
Minimal number of assistantsTwo peopleOne personOne person
SpaceRelatively largeThe smallestSmall
ColonoscopeOnly long length adult-colonoscopeBoth long length- and intermediate length- adult colonoscope (Intermediate-scope preferred)Both long length- and intermediate length- adult colonoscope (Intermediate-scope preferred)
The role of colonoscopistOnly manipulation of the control section of colonoscope; most manipulations of colonoscope such as advance (push-forward) and withdrawal (pull-back) by assistantAll manipulations of colonoscope including advance, withdrawal, and handling of the control sectionAll manipulations of colonoscope including advance, withdrawal, and handling of the control section
The fatigue of colonoscopistLowHighLowest
Location of examinee's anusBelow examiner's headBelow examiner's headExaminer's head level (colonoscopist may be required to wear a mask for hygiene reasons)
The risk of perforationRelatively high (colonoscopist cannot feel the colonoscope insertion)Relatively low (colonoscopist can feel the colonoscope insertion)Relatively low (colonoscopist can feel the colonoscope insertion)