Copyright
©2014 Baishideng Publishing Group Inc.
World J Gastroenterol. Nov 28, 2014; 20(44): 16765-16773
Published online Nov 28, 2014. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i44.16765
Published online Nov 28, 2014. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i44.16765
Study group | Co-dominant model | Dominant model | Recessive model | Additive model | |||||||||||
Asp/Asn vs Asp/Asp | Asn/Asn vs Asp/Asp | Asn/Asn+Asp/Asn vs Asp/Asp | Asn/Asn vs Asp/Asn+Asp/Asp | (2Asn/Asn+Asp/Asn) vs 2(Asp/Asn+Asn/Asn+Asp/Asp) | |||||||||||
OR (95%CI) | P | Ph | OR (95%CI) | P | Ph | OR (95%CI) | P | Ph | OR (95%CI) | P | Ph | OR (95%CI) | P | Ph | |
Total | 1.17 (1.02, 1.33) | 0.03 | 0.97 | 1.30 (1.00, 1.70) | 0.05 | 0.75 | 1.18 (1.04, 1.34) | 0.01 | 0.98 | 1.17 (0.91, 1.50) | 0.22 | 0.71 | 1.10 (1.00, 1.21) | 0.06 | 1.00 |
Cancer type | |||||||||||||||
ESCC | 1.09 (0.91, 1.31) | 0.35 | 0.95 | 0.99 (0.54, 1.79) | 0.96 | 0.48 | 1.09 (0.91, 1.30) | 0.35 | 0.99 | 0.93 (0.53, 1.63) | 0.79 | 0.40 | 1.06 (0.90, 1.24) | 0.49 | 0.99 |
EADC | 1.26 (1.03, 1.53) | 0.02 | 0.97 | 1.40 (1.04, 1.89) | 0.03 | 0.93 | 1.29 (1.07, 1.55) | 0.01 | 0.99 | 1.24 (0.94, 1.64) | 0.13 | 0.90 | 1.12 (0.99, 1.28) | 0.07 | 0.98 |
Ethnicity | |||||||||||||||
Chinese | 1.08 (0.88, 1.33) | 0.45 | 0.88 | 2.08 (0.57, 7.60) | 0.27 | 0.66 | 1.10 (0.90, 1.35) | 0.36 | 0.93 | 2.06 (0.57, 7.51) | 0.27 | 0.65 | 1.10 (0.91, 1.33) | 0.34 | 0.98 |
Non-Chinese | 1.23 (1.03, 1.47) | 0.02 | 0.95 | 1.27 (0.97, 1.67) | 0.08 | 0.54 | 1.24 (1.05, 1.47) | 0.01 | 0.93 | 1.14 (0.89, 1.47) | 0.31 | 0.53 | 1.10 (0.98, 1.23) | 0.11 | 0.92 |
- Citation: Yang R, Zhang C, Malik A, Shen ZD, Hu J, Wu YH. Xeroderma pigmentosum group D polymorphisms and esophageal cancer susceptibility: A meta-analysis based on case-control studies. World J Gastroenterol 2014; 20(44): 16765-16773
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v20/i44/16765.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v20.i44.16765