Copyright
©2014 Baishideng Publishing Group Inc.
World J Gastroenterol. Nov 28, 2014; 20(44): 16620-16629
Published online Nov 28, 2014. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i44.16620
Published online Nov 28, 2014. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i44.16620
Operation | IRA | RPC |
Indications | Mild FAP or MAP (< 20 rectal or < 1000 colonic polyps)AFAP by family history, endoscopy or genetic testingNo colorectal carcinomaYoung women without definitive offspringMetastatic CRC | Many (> 20) rectal adenomas or > 3 cm or high-grade dysplasiaSevere colonic phenotype(> 1000) or family historyColorectal carcinomaMutations in codon 1309Mesenteric desmoid or family history or APC mutation (codons 1403-1578) |
Pros | Technically simple, good function, low morbidity, no pelvic dissection | |
Cons | Metachronous rectal cancer | Technically demandingHigh morbidity |
- Citation: Campos FG. Surgical treatment of familial adenomatous polyposis: Dilemmas and current recommendations. World J Gastroenterol 2014; 20(44): 16620-16629
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v20/i44/16620.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v20.i44.16620