Copyright
©2014 Baishideng Publishing Group Inc.
World J Gastroenterol. Nov 14, 2014; 20(42): 15845-15851
Published online Nov 14, 2014. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i42.15845
Published online Nov 14, 2014. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i42.15845
Table 4 Patient compliance, acceptability and satisfaction
| NaP tablets | PEG solution | P value | |
| (n = 158) | (n = 162) | ||
| Compliance (amount of intake of cleansing agent) | 0.228 | ||
| Optimal (100%) | 151 (95.6) | 148 (91.4) | |
| Good (75%-100%) | 6 (3.8) | 14 (8.6) | |
| Poor (< 75%) | 1 (0.6) | 0 | |
| Acceptability (difficulty of the preparation) | < 0.001 | ||
| None | 86 (54.4) | 50 (30.9) | |
| Some | 59 (37.3) | 85 (52.5) | |
| Much | 13 (8.2) | 27 (16.7) | |
| Taste of the preparation | < 0.001 | ||
| Very bad | 4 (2.5) | 14 (8.6) | |
| Bad | 26 (16.5) | 54 (33.3) | |
| Neutral | 82 (51.9) | 75 (46.3) | |
| Good | 38 (24.1) | 14 (8.6) | |
| Very good | 8 (5.1) | 5 (3.1) | |
| Satisfaction level (VAS) | 7.8 ± 2.0 | 6.5 ± 2.4 | < 0.001 |
-
Citation: Jung YS, Lee CK, Kim HJ, Eun CS, Han DS, Park DI. Randomized controlled trial of sodium phosphate tablets
vs polyethylene glycol solution for colonoscopy bowel cleansing. World J Gastroenterol 2014; 20(42): 15845-15851 - URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v20/i42/15845.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v20.i42.15845