Copyright
©2014 Baishideng Publishing Group Inc.
World J Gastroenterol. Nov 14, 2014; 20(42): 15845-15851
Published online Nov 14, 2014. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i42.15845
Published online Nov 14, 2014. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i42.15845
Table 3 Detection rate of colorectal polyps and adenomas n (%)
NaP tablets (n = 158) | PEG solution (n = 162) | P value | |
Polyps regardless of size | |||
Participants | 91 (57.6) | 81 (50.0) | 0.173 |
Polyps/patient | 1.3 ± 1.7 | 1.2 ± 1.8 | 0.752 |
Polyps diameter ≤ 5 mm | |||
Participants | 76 (48.1) | 63 (38.9) | 0.096 |
Polyps/patient | 0.9 ± 1.3 | 0.8 ± 1.5 | 0.770 |
Polyps diameter > 5 mm | |||
Participants | 43 (27.2) | 44 (27.2) | 0.991 |
Polyps/patient | 0.5 ± 1.0 | 0.4 ± 0..8 | 0.508 |
Adenomas regardless of size | |||
Participants | 55 (34.8) | 57 (35.2) | 0.944 |
Polyps/patient | 0.7 ± 1.3 | 0.6 ± 1.1 | 0.679 |
Adenomas diameter ≤ 5 mm | |||
Participants | 40 (25.3) | 39 (24.1) | 0.797 |
Polyps/patient | 0.4 ± 0.9 | 0.4 ± 0.8 | 0.813 |
Adenomas diameter > 5 mm | |||
Participants | 29 (18.4) | 33 (20.4) | 0.648 |
Polyps/patient | 0.3 ± 0.7 | 0.3 ± 0.6 | 0.744 |
-
Citation: Jung YS, Lee CK, Kim HJ, Eun CS, Han DS, Park DI. Randomized controlled trial of sodium phosphate tablets
vs polyethylene glycol solution for colonoscopy bowel cleansing. World J Gastroenterol 2014; 20(42): 15845-15851 - URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v20/i42/15845.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v20.i42.15845