Meta-Analysis
Copyright ©2014 Baishideng Publishing Group Inc.
World J Gastroenterol. Nov 7, 2014; 20(41): 15440-15447
Published online Nov 7, 2014. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i41.15440
Table 2 Pooled results for overall and stratified meta-analyses of the miR-146a polymorphism
ContrastOverall or subgroupComparisons (n)OR (95%CI)P valueI2
G vs COverall71.07 (0.94-1.22)0.3274%
Asian51.05 (0.89-1.24)0.5482%
Caucasian20.99 (0.72-1.38)0.970%
High quality61.05 (0.91-1.22)0.4878%
Large sample size30.98 (0.78-1.24)0.8990%
Small sample size41.16 (1.03-1.30)0.010%
GG vs CCOverall71.14 (0.88-1.49)0.3169%
Asian51.11 (0.81-1.51)0.5179%
Caucasian21.33 (0.80-2.21)0.270%
High quality61.15 (0.86-1.53)0.3474%
Large sample size30.99 (0.63-1.57)0.9788%
Small sample size41.33 (1.03-1.73)0.030%
GG vs GCOverall71.14 (1.03-1.27)0.0119%
Asian51.11 (0.99-1.25)0.0624%
Caucasian21.36 (1.01-1.85)0.040%
High quality61.12 (1.01-1.26)0.0426%
Large sample size31.06 (0.84-1.33)0.6460%
Small sample size41.19 (0.97-1.47)0.100%
GC vs CCOverall71.03 (0.87-1.21)0.7656%
Asian50.88 (0.62-1.25)0.480%
Caucasian21.06 (0.87-1.28)0.5868%
High quality61.03 (0.87-1.23)0.7162%
Large sample size30.97 (0.77-1.21)0.7673%
Small sample size41.12 (0.93-1.36)0.2240%
GG vs GC + CCOverall70.03 (-0.01-0.07)0.1854%
Asian50.02 (-0.03-0.06)0.5466%
Caucasian20.07 (-0.00-0.14)0.060%
High quality60.02 (-0.02-0.07)0.3660%
Large sample size30.00 (-0.07-0.08)0.9483%
Small sample size40.05 (0.00-0.10)0.030%
GG + GC vs CCOverall71.06 (0.88-1.28)0.5369%
Asian51.08 (0.86-1.35)0.5229%
Caucasian20.98 (0.72-1.38)0.970%
High quality61.06 (0.87-1.30)0.5575%
Large sample size31.18 (0.98-1.40)0.0723%
Small sample size40.97 (0.72-1.31)0.8786%