Safety of fast-track rehabilitation after gastrointestinal surgery: Systematic review and meta-analysis

Table 3 Risk ratio and 95%CI of complications for FT vs CC during colorectal surgery in all of the patients

Outcome or subgroup	Studies(n)	Participants(n)	Effect estimateRR (95%CI)	heterogeneity
				I2	P value
1.1 Complication
1.1.1 FT vs CC	19	2538	0.67 (0.56, 0.82)	58%	0.0009
1.1.2 OFT vs OCC	15	1690	0.73 (0.58, 0.93)	57%	0.003
1.1.3 LFT vs LCC	8	774	0.58 (0.38, 0.88)	62%	0.01
1.1.4 LFT vs OFT	8	586	0.72 (0.56, 0.92)	24%	0.24
1.2 Anastomotic leak
1.2.1 FT vs CC	11	1939	0.92 (0.60, 1.43)	0%	0.96
1.2.2 OFT vs OCC	9	1364	0.90 (0.53, 1.53)	0%	0.90
1.2.3 LFT vs LCC	5	575	0.98 (0.48, 2.01)	0%	0.60
1.2.4 LFT vs OFT	6	626	0.83 (0.40, 1.73)	0%	0.78
1.3 obstruction
1.3.1 FT vs CC	9	1698	0.87 (0.59, 1.29)	0%	0.96
1.3.2 OFT vs OCC	7	1160	0.97 (0.62, 1.52)	0%	1.00
1.3.3 LFT vs LCC	4	539	0.67 (0.32, 1.42)	0%	0.62
1.3.4 LFT vs OFT	3	295	1.23 (0.51, 3.00)	0%	0.40
1.4 Wound infection
1.4.1 FT vs CC	14	2133	0.72 (0.52, 0.97)	10%	0.34
1.4.2 OFT vs OCC	12	1461	0.72 (0.51, 1.02)	28%	0.18
1.4.3 LFT vs LCC	5	539	0.64 (0.32, 1.26)	0%	0.91
1.4.4 LFT vs OFT	4	329	0.51 (0.26, 1.01)	35%	0.20
1.5 re-admission
1.5.1 FT vs CC	11	1468	0.99 (0.71, 1.39)	0%	0.80
1.5.2 OFT vs OCC	8	781	1.07 (0.60, 1.91)	0%	0.85
1.5.3 LFT vs LCC	5	613	0.74 (0.43, 1.28)	0%	0.82
1.5.4 LFT vs OFT	6	671	0.45 (0.29, 0.71)	14%	0.32