Copyright
©2014 Baishideng Publishing Group Inc.
World J Gastroenterol. Oct 28, 2014; 20(40): 14973-14985
Published online Oct 28, 2014. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i40.14973
Published online Oct 28, 2014. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i40.14973
Meta-analyses/subgroup analyses | Eradication rate with control group | RR (95%CI) | I2 |
Standard triple therapy vs dual therapy | 78.00% | 1.140 (0.992–1.310) | 62.596% |
7-d subgroup | 73.08% | 1.221 (1.084 –1.374) | 0.000% |
Adverse events | 0.651 (0.276–1.539) | 0.000% | |
Standard triple therapy vs sequential therapy | 84.00% | 0.863 (0.824–0.904) | 37.400% |
Adult subgroup | 82.90% | 0.899 (0.861–0.939) | 25.942% |
Child subgroup | 87.29% | 0.779 (0.722–0.840) | 0.000% |
7-d subgroup | 87.52% | 0.800 (0.752–0.851) | 0.000% |
10-d subgroup | 80.17% | 0.849 (0.789–0.913) | 42.355% |
14-d subgroup | 89.72% | 0.980 (0.916–1.048) | 0.000% |
Omeprazole subgroup | 87.37% | 0.832 (0.772–0.898) | 47.049% |
Esomeprazole subgroup | 77.01% | 0.932 (0.871–0.998) | 40.061% |
Pantoprazole subgroup | 87.13% | 0.846 (0.746–0.960) | 0.000% |
Rabeprazole subgroup | 91.24% | 0.847 (0.766–0.936) | 41.871% |
Tinidazole subgroup | 81.43% | 0.889 (0.837–0.944) | 38.688% |
Metronidazole subgroup | 83.20% | 0.810 (0.745–0.882) | 43.630% |
Adverse events | 1.176 (0.975–1.419) | 0.000% | |
Standard triple therapy vs quadruple therapy | 64.90% | 1.073 (0.849–1.357) | 93.204% |
1-d subgroup | 28.42% | 2.367 (1.923–2.914) | 0.000% |
3-d subgroup | 66.67% | 1.288 (1.061–1.562) | 100.000% |
7-d subgroup | 86.79% | 0.790 (0.718–0.868) | 0.000% |
10-d subgroup | 88.04% | 0.917 (0.839–1.002) | 22.259% |
Omeprazole subgroup | 66.67% | 1.250 (1.012–1.545) | 100.000% |
Esomeprazole subgroup | 73.76% | 1.098 (0.699–1.725) | 88.852% |
Lansoprazole subgroup | 45.00% | 1.391 (0.404–4.790) | 98.719% |
Rabeprazole subgroup | 83.99% | 0.948 (0.771–1.166) | 84.733% |
Adverse events | 0.940 (0.825–1.072) | 0.000% | |
Standard triple therapy with other triple therapies | 79.90% | 1.010 (0.936–1.089) | 72.233% |
Adult subgroup | 80.92% | 0.999 (0.925–1.078) | 69.085% |
Child subgroup | 73.25% | 1.079 (0.748–1.557) | 74.810% |
7-d subgroup | 80.32% | 1.022 (0.949–1.100) | 60.674% |
10-d subgroup | 77.78% | 0.933 (0.821–1.060) | 0.000% |
14-d subgroup | 78.40% | 1.050 (0.712–1.549) | 93.921% |
Omeprazole subgroup | 80.30% | 1.048 (0.976–1.125) | 49.506% |
Esomeprazole subgroup | 84.47% | 0.911 (0.831–0.999) | 0.000% |
Levofloxacin subgroup | 82.37% | 0.917 (0.852–0.987) | 0.000% |
Furazolidone subgroup | 85.22% | 0.963 (0.762–1.216) | 73.898% |
Metronidazole subgroup | 68.84% | 1.119 (0.882–1.420) | 80.863% |
Adverse events | 1.081 (0.848–1.378) | 0.000% | |
Eradication rate with standard triple therapy | 74.5% |
-
Citation: Wang B, Lv ZF, Wang YH, Wang H, Liu XQ, Xie Y, Zhou XJ. Standard triple therapy for
Helicobacter pylori infection in China: A meta-analysis. World J Gastroenterol 2014; 20(40): 14973-14985 - URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v20/i40/14973.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v20.i40.14973