Systematic Reviews
Copyright ©2014 Baishideng Publishing Group Inc.
World J Gastroenterol. Oct 28, 2014; 20(40): 14958-14964
Published online Oct 28, 2014. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i40.14958
Table 1 Clinical and biochemical characteristics of samples in the first part of the study n (%)
Training set
Blind test set
P-value1
MalignantBenignHealthyP-valueMalignantBenignHealthyP-value
Sex
Male13 (56.52)10 (55.56)12 (60.00)0.95710 (45.45)5 (50.00)5 (33.33)0.6620.665
Female10 (43.48)8 (44.44)8 (40.00)12 (54.55)5 (50.00)10 (66.67)
Age (yr, mean ± SD)62.61 ± 12.7160.61 ± 8.5155.50 ± 13.130.14565.14 ± 13.0259.10 ± 14.1563.07 ± 12.600.4020.18
Pathology
Ductal adenocarcinoma23 (100.00)22 (100.00)
Mucinous cystadenoma7 (38.89)2 (20.00)
Solid pseudopapillary tumor4 (22.22)
Insulinoma3 (16.67)3 (30.00)
Serous cystadenoma2 (11.11)3 (30.00)
Intraductal papillary mucinous tumor2 (11.11)2 (20.00)
CA19-9 (U/mL, mean ± SD)10.66 ± 8.9211.94 ± 6.939.67 ± 6.940.38212.45 ± 9.6915.51 ± 11.6010.00 ± 8.270.5570.667