Copyright
©2014 Baishideng Publishing Group Co.
World J Gastroenterol. Jan 28, 2014; 20(4): 899-907
Published online Jan 28, 2014. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i4.899
Published online Jan 28, 2014. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i4.899
Regimen | Efficacy | Tolerability | |||||
PFS | OS | Grade 3/4 AE | SAE | Fatal AEs | |||
RAS wt | RAS mut | RAS wt | RAS mut | ||||
FOLFOX + panitumumab[25] | 10.1 | 7.31 | 25.8 | 15.51 | 84% | 40% | 5% |
FOLFIRI + cetuximab[4,62] | 10.59.9 (KRAS exon 2) | NR1 | 33.123.5 (KRAS exon 2) | NR1 | 71%-79% | 26% | NR |
FOLFOX/XELOX + bevacizumab[56] | 9.4 | 21.3 | 80% | NR | 2% | ||
FOLFIRI + bevacizumab[7,62] | 10.4 | NR | 25.9 | NR | NR | 20% | 3.5% |
9.7 | 25.8 | ||||||
FOLFOXIRI + bevacizumab[7] | 12.1 | 31.0 | NR | 20% | 2.8% |
- Citation: Stein A, Bokemeyer C. How to select the optimal treatment for first line metastatic colorectal cancer. World J Gastroenterol 2014; 20(4): 899-907
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v20/i4/899.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v20.i4.899