Copyright
©2014 Baishideng Publishing Group Inc.
World J Gastroenterol. Oct 21, 2014; 20(39): 14472-14478
Published online Oct 21, 2014. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i39.14472
Published online Oct 21, 2014. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i39.14472
Table 9 Comparative analysis of frames per lesion
| SB24 | “SB2-like” | P value | |||
| Frames | Mean ± SD | Frames | Mean ± SD | ||
| Esophagus | 132 | 7.7 ± 9.0 | 91 | 6.5 ± 8.7 | NS |
| Stomach | 617 | 20.5 ± 34.2 | 403 | 13.4 ± 25.8 | NS |
| Small Bowel | 2227 | 11.5 ± 28.1 | 1490 | 8.1 ± 18.1 | NS |
| Colon | 249 | 14.6 ± 18.2 | 155 | 9.1 ± 12.4 | NS |
| Total | 3225 | 12.8 ± 15.2 | 2139 | 8.7 ± 15.6 | NS |
- Citation: Fernandez-Urien I, Carretero C, Borobio E, Borda A, Estevez E, Galter S, Gonzalez-Suarez B, Gonzalez B, Lujan M, Martinez JL, Martínez V, Menchén P, Navajas J, Pons V, Prieto C, Valle J. Capsule endoscopy capture rate: Has 4 frames-per-second any impact over 2 frames-per-second? World J Gastroenterol 2014; 20(39): 14472-14478
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v20/i39/14472.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v20.i39.14472