Copyright
©2014 Baishideng Publishing Group Inc.
World J Gastroenterol. Oct 21, 2014; 20(39): 14472-14478
Published online Oct 21, 2014. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i39.14472
Published online Oct 21, 2014. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i39.14472
Table 5 Comparative analysis of frames per landmark n (%)
| SB24 | "SB2-like" | P value | |||
| Frames | Mean ± SD | Frames | Mean ± SD | ||
| Z-line | 616 | 11.6 ± 20.4 | 391 | 8.6 ± 10.6 | NS |
| Papilla | 35 | 5.0 ± 2.0 | 15 | 2.5 ± 1.4 | < 0.05 |
- Citation: Fernandez-Urien I, Carretero C, Borobio E, Borda A, Estevez E, Galter S, Gonzalez-Suarez B, Gonzalez B, Lujan M, Martinez JL, Martínez V, Menchén P, Navajas J, Pons V, Prieto C, Valle J. Capsule endoscopy capture rate: Has 4 frames-per-second any impact over 2 frames-per-second? World J Gastroenterol 2014; 20(39): 14472-14478
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v20/i39/14472.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v20.i39.14472