Copyright
©2014 Baishideng Publishing Group Inc.
World J Gastroenterol. Oct 21, 2014; 20(39): 14472-14478
Published online Oct 21, 2014. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i39.14472
Published online Oct 21, 2014. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i39.14472
Table 1 Institutions and patients included
| Institution | n |
| Hospital de Navarra | 8 |
| Clinica Universidad de Navarra | 5 |
| Hospital Gregorio Marañon | 10 |
| Hospital Juan Canalejo | 10 |
| Hospital Puerta de Hierro | 9 |
| Hospital del Mar | 8 |
| Complejo Hospitalario de Toledo | 9 |
| Hospital La Fe | 10 |
| Hospital General de Valencia | 10 |
| Mutua de Tarrassa | 10 |
| Total | 89 |
- Citation: Fernandez-Urien I, Carretero C, Borobio E, Borda A, Estevez E, Galter S, Gonzalez-Suarez B, Gonzalez B, Lujan M, Martinez JL, Martínez V, Menchén P, Navajas J, Pons V, Prieto C, Valle J. Capsule endoscopy capture rate: Has 4 frames-per-second any impact over 2 frames-per-second? World J Gastroenterol 2014; 20(39): 14472-14478
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v20/i39/14472.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v20.i39.14472