Original Article
Copyright ©2014 Baishideng Publishing Group Inc.
World J Gastroenterol. Oct 14, 2014; 20(38): 13920-13929
Published online Oct 14, 2014. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i38.13920
Table 4 Comparison of diagnostic performance between noninvasive serum marker for discriminating F0-1 vs F2-4 (significant fibrosis), F0-2 vs F3-4 (advanced fibrosis) and F0-3 vs F4 (cirrhosis) (n =61)
AUROC95%CIPairwise comparison of ROC curves
FactorDifference between areas (95%CI)P value
Significant fibrosis
SWE0.9080.806-0.967HA0.097 (-0.012-0.205)0.081
Type IV0.067 (-0.003-0.167)0.189
APRI0.217 (0.074-0.359)0.003
HA0.8120.691-0.900Type IV0.030 (-0.092-0.152)0.634
APRI0.120 (-0.041-0.281)0.145
Type IV0.8410.725-0.922APRI0.150 (-0.006-0.305)0.059
APRI0.6910.560-0.803
Advanced fibrosis
SWE0.8930.787-0.957HA0.004 (-0.093-0.101)0.939
Type IV0.017 (-0.080-0.113)0.735
APRI0.150 (0.013-0.287)0.032
HA0.8970.792-0.960Type IV0.020 (-0.074-0.115)0.671
APRI0.154 (0.014-0.293)0.031
Type IV0.8760.767-0.947APRI0.133 (-0.010-0.277)0.069
APRI0.7430.615-0.846
Cirrhosis
SWE0.8770.768-0.947HA0.002 (-0.114-0.118)0.974
Type IV0.027 (-0.084-0.138)0.631
APRI0.194 (0.031-0.358)0.002
HA0.8790.770-0.948Type IV0.029 (-0.072-0.130)0.571
APRI0.196 (0.022-0.371)0.027
Type IV0.8500.736-0.928APRI0.167 (-0.003-0.338)0.055
APRI0.6830.551-0.796