Copyright
©2014 Baishideng Publishing Group Inc.
World J Gastroenterol. Oct 14, 2014; 20(38): 13775-13782
Published online Oct 14, 2014. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i38.13775
Published online Oct 14, 2014. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i38.13775
Table 4 Performance of magnetic resonance imaging in preoperative T and N staging
Ref. | Year | Number of patients (n) | Stage | Accuracy (%) | Overstaging (%) | Understaging (%) |
Sohn et al[53] | 2000 | 30 | Overall T | 73.3 | 6.7 | 20 |
N | 55.2 | 10.3 | 34.5 | |||
Kang et al[51] | 2000 | 46 | Overall T | 82.6 | 2.2 | 15.2 |
N | 52.2 | 17.4 | 30.4 | |||
Wang et al[54] | 2000 | 33 | Overall T | 87.9 | 6 | 6 |
Kim et al[52] | 2000 | 26 (AGC) | Overall T | 80.7 | 19.2 | 0 |
N | 65.4 | 0 | 34.6 | |||
Zhong et al[55] | 2005 | 16 | Overall T | 64.3 | 14.3 | 21.4 |
Arocena et al[21] | 2006 | 17 | Overall T | 53 | 23.5 | 23.5 |
N | 50 | 25 | 25 |
- Citation: Hwang SW, Lee DH. Is endoscopic ultrasonography still the modality of choice in preoperative staging of gastric cancer? World J Gastroenterol 2014; 20(38): 13775-13782
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v20/i38/13775.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v20.i38.13775