Copyright
©2014 Baishideng Publishing Group Inc.
World J Gastroenterol. Oct 14, 2014; 20(38): 13775-13782
Published online Oct 14, 2014. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i38.13775
Published online Oct 14, 2014. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i38.13775
Ref. | Year | Number of studies (n) | Stage | Accuracy (pooled, %) | Sensitivity (pooled, %) | Specificity (pooled, %) |
Kwee et al[14] | 2007 | 23 | overall T | 265-92.1 | - | - |
Puli et al[23] | 2008 | 22 | T1 | - | 88.1 | 100.0 |
T2 | - | 82.3 | 95.6 | |||
T3 | - | 89.7 | 94.7 | |||
T4 | - | 99.2 | 96.7 | |||
Mocellin et al[24] | 2011 | 54 | T1-2 vs T3-4 | - | 86.0 | 91.0 |
T1 | - | 83.0 | 96.0 | |||
T2 | - | 65.0 | 91.0 | |||
T3 | - | 86.0 | 85.0 | |||
T4 | - | 66.0 | 98.0 | |||
Cardoso et al[25] | 2012 | 22 | Overall T | 75 (256.9-87.7) | - | - |
T1 | 77 (214-100) | - | - | |||
T2 | 65 (224-90) | - | - | |||
T3 | 85 (250-100) | - | - | |||
T4 | 79 (222-100) | - | - |
- Citation: Hwang SW, Lee DH. Is endoscopic ultrasonography still the modality of choice in preoperative staging of gastric cancer? World J Gastroenterol 2014; 20(38): 13775-13782
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v20/i38/13775.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v20.i38.13775