Copyright
©2014 Baishideng Publishing Group Inc.
World J Gastroenterol. Sep 28, 2014; 20(36): 13178-13184
Published online Sep 28, 2014. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i36.13178
Published online Sep 28, 2014. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i36.13178
Table 4 Subgroup of self-rated “difficult” colonoscopy procedures
Colonoscopy procedures | Conventional colonoscopy(n = 25) | Magnetic imaging colonoscopy(n = 36) | Total(n = 61) | P value |
Time-to-cecum (min) | 13.4 | 10.10 | 11.50 | 0.01 |
(6.7-29.5) | (3.8-28) | (3.8-29.5) | ||
Distance to cecum (cm) | 91.20 | 85.70 | 88 | 0.30 |
(68-130) | (49-150) | (49-150) | ||
Sedation score | 9.54 | 9.08 | 9.27 | 0.61 |
(5-17) | (5-21) | (5-21) | ||
Pain score | 1.48 | 1.15 | 1.28 | 0.53 |
(0.1-8.4) | (0.1-7.9) | (0.1-8.4) | ||
Pain difference | -1.05 | -1.50 | -1.32 | 0.54 |
(-6.8-3.3) | (-7.8-4.9) | (-7.8-4.9) |
-
Citation: Teshima CW, Zepeda-Gómez S, AlShankiti SH, Sandha GS. Magnetic imaging-assisted colonoscopy
vs conventional colonoscopy: A randomized controlled trial. World J Gastroenterol 2014; 20(36): 13178-13184 - URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v20/i36/13178.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v20.i36.13178