Copyright
©2014 Baishideng Publishing Group Inc.
World J Gastroenterol. Sep 28, 2014; 20(36): 13178-13184
Published online Sep 28, 2014. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i36.13178
Published online Sep 28, 2014. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i36.13178
Table 3 Patient experience outcomes
| Score | Conventional colonoscopy(n = 122) | Magnetic imaging colonoscopy(n = 131) | Total(n = 253) | P value |
| Pain score | 0.85 (0.1-8.4) | 1.03 (0.1-10) | 0.94 (0.1-10) | 0.41 |
| Pretest pain score | 2.2 (0.1-8.5) | 2.9 (0.1-9) | 2.5 (0.1-9) | 0.02 |
| Pain difference | -1.3 | -1.8 | -1.6 | 0.14 |
| Sedation score | 8.5 (4.5-17) | 8.2 (4-21) | 8.3 (4-21) | 0.34 |
-
Citation: Teshima CW, Zepeda-Gómez S, AlShankiti SH, Sandha GS. Magnetic imaging-assisted colonoscopy
vs conventional colonoscopy: A randomized controlled trial. World J Gastroenterol 2014; 20(36): 13178-13184 - URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v20/i36/13178.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v20.i36.13178