Copyright
©2014 Baishideng Publishing Group Inc.
World J Gastroenterol. Sep 28, 2014; 20(36): 13178-13184
Published online Sep 28, 2014. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i36.13178
Published online Sep 28, 2014. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i36.13178
Table 2 Endoscopic outcomes
| Endoscopic outcomes | Conventional colonoscopy(n = 122) | Magnetic imaging colonoscopy(n = 131) | Total(n = 253) | P value |
| Cecal intubation n (%) | 121 (99.2) | 131 (100) | 252 (99.6) | 0.30 |
| TI intubation n (%) | 42 (34.4) | 46 (35.1) | 88 (34.8) | 0.91 |
| Distance to cecum (cm) | 83 (53–130) | 82.4 (49–150) | 82.7 (49–150) | 0.71 |
| Time-to-cecum (min) | 7.2 (2-29.5) | 6.5 (1.2-28) | 6.9 (1.2-29.5) | 0.18 |
| Total procedure time (min) | 16.7 (8.1-36) | 15.7 (5.7-40) | 16.2 (5.7-40) | 0.19 |
| Polyp detection rate | 51.60% (0.43, 0.61) | 46.60% (0.38, 0.55) | 49.0% | 0.42 |
| Meanpolyps (range) | 1.7 (1-7) | 1.9 (1-8) | 1.8 (1-8) | 0.36 |
| Quality of bowel prep | ||||
| Excellent | 21.3% | 29.8% | 25.7% | |
| Acceptable | 49.2% | 43.5% | 46.3% | |
| Fair | 25.4% | 24.4% | 24.9% | |
| Poor | 4.1% | 2.3% | 3.2% | |
| Procedures self-rated as “difficult”n (%) | 25 (20.5) | 36 (27.5) | 61 (24.1) | 0.19 |
| Sedation, mean doses (range) | ||||
| Midazolam (mg) | 5.8 (3-15) | 5.5 (2-15) | 5.7 (2-15) | 0.31 |
| Fentanyl (mcg) | 86.3 (50-150) | 83.2 (50-150) | 84.7 (50-150) | 0.29 |
-
Citation: Teshima CW, Zepeda-Gómez S, AlShankiti SH, Sandha GS. Magnetic imaging-assisted colonoscopy
vs conventional colonoscopy: A randomized controlled trial. World J Gastroenterol 2014; 20(36): 13178-13184 - URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v20/i36/13178.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v20.i36.13178